5 Reasons Why the “Old School” Car Allowance Doesn’t Work Today

Remember the days when you shrugged and accepted that the time and money spent on the vehicle allowance program was just a “cost of doing business?” Wait a second, this is how you are still operating your vehicle reimbursement policy? CarData can help.

HR Technology News: Why an Online Job Listing Isn’t Enough to Attract Potential Candidates

While some old school business processes still have value today, odds are a Flat Rate, or other dated VRP isn’t one of them. Here are five reasons why.

  1. There’s probably unnecessary risk and invalid expenses
    Some traditional plans don’t meet regulations for fair and defensible tax reimbursement. For example, one of our clients had more than 400 employees on a Flat Rate Allowance plan logging a total of over 4.85 million miles per year. Drivers manually tracked and reported activity, which was not auditable and therefore non-accountable. It also was impossible for the company to discern business vs. personal use. That mattered because their plan included a fuel card and there was no practical way to separate gas used when the car was “on the job” or not. After all, you can’t press pause on a gas tank.
  2. There’s no accounting for relative cost of living
    At first blush, reimbursing all drivers the same amount seems to be fair – there’s no favoritism and consequently no personnel issues, right? Drivers in companies with offices around the country will tell you otherwise. Just like differences in rent, real estate and taxes, the costs for operating a vehicle varies based on location. You might have seen our recent blog post “A Tale of Two Cities: How a Flat Rate Auto Reimbursement Program Sparked Policy Transformation.” In it, we compare Milwaukee and Washington, D.C. Gut instinct will tell you that D.C. is more expensive, but how much? Skim that blog and you’ll find out.

HR Technology News: Irene DeNigris Promoted to the Position of Chief People Officer at iCIMS

  1. You have better things to do than run a VRP
    Most enterprises are in the midst of “digital transformation,” which includes reevaluating core processes and working hard to eliminate data silos. Traditionally, HR and finance take on the administrative tasks that go along with a company-run VRP. While different flavors of old school VRPs call for a varying levels of resources to execute, wouldn’t it be better if a dedicated team of experts took on that burden, enabling HR to ensure the company was protected and Finance to focus on line-of-business decisions? Another plus: The data and processes are moved to the cloud. Data is secure and accessible from anywhere, drivers are paid electronically each month, and the software is maintained by the provider, CarData.
  2. It’s possible that people are not making customer visits
    Human nature can sometimes get the best of people. Vehicle allowances are often are provided because a lot of driving goes with the job. At some point, just about anyone might question whether the allowance truly accounts for the wear and tear on the vehicle and on-going maintenance. If an employee feels they are paying out-of-pocket to drive customer visits can be a deterrent.
  3. It’s costing you money  
    We’d be surprised if this point doesn’t get your attention. Moving to an accountable VRP results in FICA reduction – reimbursement is not considered income with a FAVR (fixed and variable rate) plan. If you factor in tax savings with reduced costs for, resources and overpayments, the direct savings are 10% – 30%. We’ve seen customer-after-customer quickly surpass the point where a positive ROI for outsourcing is reached.

HR Technology News: Paycor HCM Helps Blackbaud Nonprofit Customers Simplify Back-office Challenges